Thursday, April 8, 2021

Law & Order SVU “Welcome To The Pedo Motel” Recap, Review, Discussion


Law & Order SVU “Welcome To The Pedo Motel” was one of those episodes where the outcome of the crime was predictable.  But the story was fast-paced (sometimes complicated with a lot of players) and that kept it engaging, despite the sad circumstances.  This is something to be expected with an episode directed by Jean de Segonzac, one of my favorites.  The story was filled with references to people, including law enforcement, making snap judgments and assuming guilt without having the facts, contributing to the tragedies.  There were also interesting personal “tidbits” peppered throughout the episode.    

First, the tidbits - that's what you really want to hear about, right? 

We’re not long into the episode when Carisi asks Benson about her “friend” Stabler. She explains she talked to him a few times but...and Carisi says Stabler has a rough road.  Benson is worried for him, and Carisi comments he doesn’t know if it’s the healthiest thing for Stabler to be investigating his wife’s murder.  Benson asks if Carisi wants to tell him that.  Clearly Carisi has never watched any crime shows on TV because the husband of the murdered wife ALWAYS has to avenge her death (wink).  Carisi explains that the 8th Floor has been asking him what’s going on with Stabler when Stabler broke into the interrogation room.  Clearly the 8th floor should know Stabler by now.  Of course, Carisi says he has Benson’s back but to make sure she’s watching hers too.   You’ll have to watch the following episode of Law & Order  Organized Crime “Not Your Father’s Organized Crime” to find out how Benson dealt with Stabler on this issue. 

Fin regrets assuming Lonnie was guilty because of where Lonnie lived.  In a way, Fin reacted no differently than the bikers, but at least Fin realized he was wrong to make assumptions.  Sadly, it’s doubtful that those involved in the actual crimes learned that lesson.

Rollins blows off her dad, thinking  he’s drinking again.  Later, she finds he’s had a stroke.

It seems Carisi is seeing someone else, and when he has an opening to break the news to Rollins, he is interrupted when Rollins gets a phone call with the bad news about her father.  Carisi urges  her to go to him. 

Sergeant Hasim Khaldun  returned to assist in the investigation.  He previously appeared in the SVU episodes “Dance, Lies and Videotape” and “I Deserve Some Loving Too”. 


Now, the case:

The “Pedo Motel” is a building well known to house former sex offenders.  (No one wants to have a sex offender living in their neighborhood, but those offenders that  have done their time DO need a place to live after prison, with restrictions as needed.)  One of the residents, named Lonnie, worked at the same pizza place as a young girl, Ceranda, who is later found murdered.   Lonnie doesn’t seem to have an alibi and, on surveillance video, it looks like Lonnie, in his distinctive jacket, was there. Lonnie also denies committing the sex crime for which he originally served time.   Add to the mix a group of bikers,  who are constantly harassing the men living in the “Pedo Motel” who think Lonnie killed Ceranda.   When Lonnie is later found dead from a lynching, mutilation,  and being horribly burned from being set on fire, it seems like somebody got justice the hard way, and the bikers are likely suspects. 

But all is not what it seems.  The bikers point the SVU to an NYPD surveillance camera which shows they weren’t at the crime scene.   The SVU continues to investigate Lonnie’s death and find that another group of bikers were at that scene,   and this leads them to  Eduardo (who had a photo of the dead Lonnie on his phone) who leads them to parolees Louie and Juan of the Dyckman Knights gang, who said they did it to impress Elvis, the head of the original biker gang. (Follow me so far?) This closes Lonnie’s murder. 

They can’t identify the DNA on the brick that killed Ceranda, which means Lonnie (whose DNA is on file) did not murder Ceranda. It looks like he was set up, as the person on the surveillance video wore the same jacket as Lonnie.  They also find that Lonnie’s Metro Card shows he wasn’t near that location, so he  DID have an alibi. Fin bemoans that he assumed Lonnie was guilty because he lived in that “rat trap”  and he made too many assumptions.  He thinks it’s on him, so he decides to break the news to Lonnie’s family.

The SVU looks into the first charge made against Lonnie for the rape of McKenna Jensen, a white girl.  Her racist stepfather, Roy Eastman,  a parole officer, accused Lonnie,  calling the cops on Lonnie once Lonnie turned 18.  This leads them to check all Roy’s parolees’ DNA, which helps them determine that Roy has been getting his parolees to do his bidding under threat of being tagged as violating their parole.   They discover Ceranda’s killer, whose coat purposely matched Lonnie’s to frame him.  He flippantly explains he hit her with the brick because she wouldn’t stop screaming.  This leads them back to parole officer Roy Eastman for the set-up and Benson tells Carisi to  have him picked him up and “Make it hurt”  – 25 to life.  Roy is arrested.  Roy wanted Lonnie dead as he didn’t want Lonnie involved with his stepdaughter. There was no sexual assault; McKenna and Lonnie were in love and they’d been together at the time of Ceranda’s murder.  Lonnie swore her to secrecy about that meeting, which was Lonnie’s alibi.  Bottom line: Lonnie was innocent on all counts – and people were killed because of hate.  




19 comments:

A said...

Despite my dislike for intros of this type that take away the mystery (the fact that the assailant's face wasn't shown mad it too obvious that it wasn't Lonnie), I did kind of like how this one developed and that some creative thinking solved the case. But the racial components were VERY off. What the hell kind of "white power" gang is led by Muslims and has black and Latino members? Since when does a bigot like Eastman consider someone like Ceranda to be white? Next episode (which seems a lot like Weeping Willow, which they already somewhat did in the second half of Intimidation Game) is also another supposed "white supremacist" group, but we'll see where that goes.

The things with Rollins, are they going to show any of this or is it just an excuse to explain Kelli Giddish's absence from the show for however many weeks?

Elliot said...

@A I def think they're finally revisiting the carisi-rollins relationship. it may take a while but it was no coincidence that carisi had a date and was there for rollins assuring her she could go to atlanta etc. i'm curious if they'll ever end up together tho as i don't think svu has ever had a successful relationship lol. would be cool to see.

re episode itself i agree it was pretty unrealistic, but raised some important issues, like how many black people don't trust cops (even black cops), and the most powerful line in the episode imo, "this happened for one reason: hate" - very apropos at this time in our country.

Elliot said...

also raised the good point about how sex offenders still deserve a place to live. ripped from the headliens a bit given the rise in crime on UWS this summer. thought they did a good job of showing both sides of the argument and that a balance is needed.

Kenzie said...

@A It says in the description of the next episode that she helps her father so I assume it will show that.

princey said...

I may be in the minority here, but I absolutely HATED this episode. This episode's events happened literally because SVU jumped to conclusions and assumed that Lonnie was the perp from 1 false bad rep. A good example of guilty until proven innocent. The svu team shouldve gotten every side of the story before making judgment, and in the end, 2 families lives were ruined due to the headstrongness of svu. This episode reminded me a lot of decayed morality from season 16, and has the exact same problems as it. Overall, a bad episode that I will never watch again. I give it a 1/10.

Elliot said...

@princey i think that was kinda the point tho. fin felt incredibly guilty about it. but they didn't kill him, and he did seem good for it, having changed his story etc...also they didnt leak to the press that he was the prime suspect. so i cut them some slack here.

Elliot said...

anyone know what the guy meant when he said "when god was giving out dolls you must have thought he said balls"? like i know it was supposed to be sexist but just don't quite get the reference lol

Dawgdays said...

Means Benson has guts for trying to go past him in the doorway. Instead of backing down because you girls and their dolls would never try that (yeah right)

300tps said...

I rolled my eyes at about the half way mark when they needed to find a way to zag. Sloppy detective work as always and the conclusions were silly and came together far too neatly.

JTC said...

Sex offenders don't deserve a place to live..... They don't even deserve to live!

Chris Zimmer said...

FYI - This post has been updated with my recap and review! Thanks for your patience.

Chris Zimmer said...

@Jessica Norick - I don't agree with that. Some people can be labeled that without it actually being a sex crime. For example, someone urinating in public can get a person on the registry. Yes, some sex crimes, such as rape, are horrific. Abd those have stiff penalties but death shouldn't be one of them.

Chris Zimmer said...

Reply to "A" - I believe the man who plays Rollins' dad is in the next episode so I suspect she will be also.

Mending_Wall said...

Is it me or did it take forever for them to set this story up? I knew Lonnie wasn't the one from the beginning. The first guy is never the real suspect. When will they stop this trope?

I can't blame anyone for not wanting sex offenders in their neighborhood. No matter how low the recidivism is, people don't trust them. However they have to be somewhere.

Both these deaths were straight up hate. They didn't care what Lonnie was accused of, they just wanted a black man dead. If you engage in vigilante justice, at least get the right person. But something tells me they didn't care whether he did it or not. That wasn't the point.

As for rollins and carisi, I wish they would let that go. It is about time he moved on. He can find someone else. She made it clear over the years she doesn't want him.

Elliot said...

@mending_wall sometimes it is the first guy tho...I like how they vary it sometimes and episodes head in unique directions.

As for rollins and carisi I disagree, I think they're clearly in a back and forth ross/rachel him/pam type of relationship, both liking each other at dif times etc...I just wonder if they'll ever actually get (and stick) together, bc the show literally has never done that with 2 characters lol

Elliot said...

I don't think it was that sloppy...they didn't even get a chance to decide to arrest him before he got killed. The real question is how it got leaked that he was the prime suspect...I guess word travels so fast these days like they said and all u need is one

Mary said...

I thought it took long to get to the crime. All the stuff leading up to the girl getting attacked was lame and unnecessary. I think the whole Rollisi thing is annoying. She pitched a hissy fit last year when he left but neither of them will just talk. I know it’s the whole will they won’t they that they did with Benson and Stabler but it’s old.

Laurie F said...

There were too many twists and turns and people involved in this I couldn't always follow it. Lately it seems like they have to make the investigation too complicated rather than focus on actual evidence.

What is taking Carisi so long to tell Rollins he's seeing somebody? Is he worried she's going to go nuts? I don't want any more Rollins drama either, but her dad will bring it anyway.

It was an okay episode.

Unknown said...

I thought it was a good episode.

Still don't hate Rollins but have to admit even I am growing weary of how they write this character. Her storyline is just all over the place. They make big things happen to her but there is no follow-through. And the info we get on her is disjointed and incongruent. E.g.- with all that we've seen of Kim and how she treated Amanda all of a sudden Kim is good and trying and Amanda, who's always been criticized for rushing too quickly to her defense, is now the bad guy for being cautious and wanting boundaries. At the end of this ep Carisi suggests she leave her kids with the mother and I'm thinking HOW is this a good idea?! Given everything we know abt A's childhood and how the mother treated her as adult even sneaking Kim in to A's own house how is it suddenly reasonable and responsible that she leaves her young kids w the mom? Now the Mom is 'good' too? And can be trusted? Sharp u-turn. And we know A has had an unhealthy attachment to her father but the reaction she and Carisi had felt like we were talking about your avg dad and not the guy who physically abused his family, introduced A to her gambling addiction and OD'd in front of her 3 year old.

After that weak chat w Liv in the Apr 01 ep- that did not need to happen so soon- I'm letting go of any hope that anything meaningful will be done w Amanda. Feels like she's becoming a background xter anyway. I'm ok w her and Carisi going separate ways at least for now Everything happening to and for Amanda has always been a conduit for the Rollisi storyline- even her Dad having a stroke! Maybe this will give space for the many abandoned plots to be explored a bit more. But for the most part I'm over it which i never thought I'd feel but the story of A is just all over the place, stunted because of a lack of continuity and it's frustrating.

Overall tho I'm liking the Thurs night lineup. I'm a big fan of Manifest too so Thurs on NBC has become a good night of tv