Saturday, January 12, 2008

L&O Actors in Other Roles: Adam Beach in the new “Comanche Moon”

Adam Beach will have a role in the mini-series “Comanche Moon”, which has its first installment on CBS on Sunday, January 13 at 9:00 PM ET. Comanche Moon is a prequel to the “Lonesome Dove” mini-series. The Sioux City Journal wrote an interesting article about Adam, covering Comanche Moon and his work with Law & Order SVU. The article is below.

Adam is also currently nominated for a Golden Globe for "Best Performance by an Actor in a Mini-Series or a Motion Picture Made for Television" for "Bury My Heart at Wounded Knee." This mini-series already won Dick Wolf an Emmy.

"Adam Beach breaks barriers
By Bruce R. Miller Journal staff writer

LOS ANGELES -- Hollywood Indian.

The term makes Adam Beach bristle. "It's such a stereotype," he says. "And yet, how do you get people away from it?"

His solution: Play a detective on "Law & Order: Special Victims Unit" who just happens to be Mohawk.

"In one year on that show," he says, "I did what I've been trying to do in 17 -- create a different perception of who we are as Indian people. It's amazing."

Growing up in Canada, Beach longed to have Johnny Depp's career. "On '21 Jump Street,' he played different characters involved with different high schools. I wanted to live a different life, too. Coming from the second worst neighborhood in Canada, I wanted more.

"The neighborhood was predominantly native and 80 percent of them went to jail."

Today, the 35-year-old says, he acts because he wants to be a role model for other native kids. "I never saw myself as Tom Cruise or wanting to have a certain stature. I just wanted to evolve and be the best I could be."

True to form, his resume has gotten more impressive every year. In 2006, he was key to Clint Eastwood's "Flags of Our Fathers." This week, he plays Blue Duck, the outcast son of a Comanche warrior in "Comanche Moon," a prequel to the award-winning "Lonesome Dove." ("That's got to be one of the worst names," he says with a laugh.)

But the prestige factor of the miniseries can't be ignored -- it's written by Oscar winners Larry McMurtry and Diana Ossana and it stars Val Kilmer, Steve Zahn and Rachel Griffiths. Best of all, it's one of those network cornerstones that could spell big ratings in the cold of winter.

A member of the Saulteaux Tribe of Manitoba, Beach was sent to live with relatives in Winnipeg after his parents died within two months of each other. Acting became a release and a chance to prove "we're not just a statistic of failure. There are some of us doing good."

At 16, he met an extras casting director who hired him for a role in "Lost in the Barrens." That led to independent films and several Canadian series. When Eastwood came calling, Beach was ready. The Oscar-winning director cast him as World War II Marine Ira Hayes -- a troubled man who couldn't deal with the attention that came from his participation in the raising of the flag at Iwo Jima. The role won Beach critical acclaim and a shot at making that "role model" dream come true.

"I'm not in the business to make money. I'm someone that a generation of native peoples across North America looks to in the sense of a hero -- someone who has done the impossible."

While he isn't Mohawk, Beach says he's able to tap into the tribe's characteristics and use them to fuel Detective Chester Lake, the character he plays on "SVU."

"Mohawks have a lot of bravado," he explains. "They're known for being a really tough, tough nation. When they'd play lacrosse, there'd be 400 members on each side doing battle. To score a goal, someone would die. They used the game to resolve land issues and the Mohawks always won."

The Mohawks were native to the New York area and helped build it, he says. So that drive -- that pride of heritage -- gives Lake reason for some of his actions.

Beach's tribe? "The Saulteaux were Eastern Woodland Indians. They had a relationship with the Plains Indians," he says. "They're good people but they're not like the Mohawks."

That nuance, he says, is something he wishes more people knew. Eventually, "we'll get there."

Now, though, he's dealing with life in New York. "The first time I was there I stayed in a hotel and lasted about 10 minutes. I felt like a rat in a laboratory. I went walking down the streets and realized you couldn't see the sunlight.

"Now, it's like I'm in the center of the world. The people you run into could be a businessman or a homeless man. The mayor still takes subway and he's a wealthy man. The city never stops. It makes you want more out of yourself because you're so consumed by everybody else surrounding you."

Television? "It's an extension of who you are. When I joined 'Law & Order' the other actors said, 'Just be yourself. Try not to overanalyze who the character is. They want you.'"

Beach heeded the advice but found himself copying Christopher Meloni's speech patterns. "I sounded like him," he says. "He said, 'Hey, Adam...don't come in and do the same thing I'm doing.' I figured, he's the lead actor, you don't want to overstep his boundaries, you want to complement what he does. So I listened and now I'm more like me."

"Comanche Moon" airs Sunday on CBS; "Law & Order: SVU" airs at 9 p.m. Tuesdays on NBC. "

A link to the actual article can be found here.


Check out my blog home page for the latest Law & Order information, HERE!

Also, see my companion Law & Order site,
These Are Their Stories.

Friday, January 11, 2008

"The View" from Sam Waterston: January 16

Sam Waterston is scheduled to be on ABC’s “The View” on Wednesday, January 16. He’s being billed as “Sam Waterston (Unity '08 and Law & Order)” so you know some politics will be discussed.

Check your local listings for air time.

Check out my blog home page for the latest Law & Order information,
HERE!

Also, see my companion Law & Order site,
These Are Their Stories.

Thursday, January 10, 2008

Law & Order “Misbegotten”: Missed the Mark, Got Me Confused

I can always tell the sign of a confusing episode. It’s when I have to back up the recording and watch a scene over.

I had to do that a lot for “Misbegotten.” The first problem was that there were many times that I had to re-listen to something that Cyrus Lupo (Jeremy Sisto) said, because he seems to mumble AND speak in a very low register, which for me makes him hard to understand. The second problem is that there were too many people and names involved that I was having a hard time keeping track of who was who. The third time was to enjoy the scenes with Jack McCoy (Sam Waterston) because right now they seem to be the best parts of the show.

Many other things seem “off” in other ways with this new season of Law & Order. I think it’s a collection of many things:

1. Jeremy Sisto, who seems to be so low key and brooding that he’s almost invisible to me. Speak up and emote, please!

2. Weird camera angles. In one scene, Ed (Jesse Martin) was questioning a husband and wife about their involvement, and the camera is shooting Ed and the husband from the back. You can see one side of Ed’s face and a lot of his body, but most of the rest of the shot is the husband's back – and glare. There was also a scene in Anita’s (S. Epatha Merkerson) office where she is talking to Green and Lupo and her back is to the camera. I never saw more backs in my life, and it makes for uninteresting viewing.

3. Yet another reference to Lupo’s sister-in-law, and a strange one at that. Did we really have to see her legs walking up the stairs while Ed stared at them? This does not bode well, I think. Please make the sister-in-law go away.

4. Along that line, what is the deal with all this personal information from the characters? I really though it odd when Ed went on about his personal experience with abortion. It seemed out of place for a show that always took great pains to keep personal stuff out. Couple that with Ed’s staring at the sister-in-law, and suddenly I don’t care if I get to know Ed any more.

5. The first half of this show seemed abnormally confusing to me. I couldn’t keep track of all the players. I also sensed a weird vibe with Anita and Ed, and Anita and Lupo. She suddenly seems at odds with both of them. Frankly I would think by now she would be able to have a different kind of discussion with Ed if she questioned something he did. The whole chemistry with the detective group is way off. I'm going to say something very frightening here: I think that I would rather see Chester Lake (Adam Beach) from the SVU team paired with Ed. As annoying as Chester is, he would have been a better fit on L&O. (I can't believe said it, but there it is.)

6. The introduction of the baseball bat in Cutter’s office was silly. The manner in which it was done was as serious as an infraction as too much personal information. Case in point: In Jack’s office, we always saw fleeting hints of Jack in either a picture or something he kept on his credenza, like that model sailboat or the picture of his daughter. Those things were always props, yet they teased at whom Jack McCoy “the person” was. But, I guess that the people writing the show now think that with Cutter, we need to make his props more obvious, and literally and figuratively hitting us with it using a baseball bat. It seemed very out of place and way too staged, and came off as phony.

7. The limited courtroom scenes were dull.


Things I liked:

1. Jack McCoy. He’s still got “IT”, and is getting the best lines and scenes of the show. “Put that away” in response to Cutter’s (Linus Roache) dragging out his blackberry to call the judge. “Too late, Joe…Judge”, Jack catches himself referring to the judge by his name during an ex parte discussion – and the Judge’s comment “Nice to still see you tilting at windmills.” Jack McCoy – and of course Sam Waterston – really know how to bring out the drama.

2. The second half of the show has more possibilities than the first. Connie Rubirosa (Alana De La Garza) had funny dialog with Cutter. When Cutter says, “This boy of yours, Jack McCoy…” and she responds, “We agreed no dumping on Jack in front of Connie.” I think Cutter and Rubirosa have potential for great chemistry.


The real stinker here was the story itself. It didn’t grab me. It didn’t draw me in. There was no drama. I didn’t care about the characters or the outcome. It was like everybody is going through the motions. And the whole “feel” of the show seems foreign. There’s nothing wrong with tweaking the formula of a show to bring some excitement, but there’s also the adage “If it’s not broken, don’t fix it.” It seems that in the process of changing out and adding actors, they’ve messed with the formula, the camera angles, the look of the sets, the feel of the dialog, etc. I don’t feel like I am watching the same Law & Order that I have loved and enjoyed all these years.

I keep hoping that the next episode will be better, but somehow I don’t have high hopes for this season. If the show continues to get its rhythm in the second half of the show, there may be hope. But I do have worries about the first half of the show. It’s fallen and I’m not sure it can get up.



Check out my blog home page for the latest Law & Order information,
HERE!

Also, see my companion Law & Order site,
These Are Their Stories.

Wednesday, January 9, 2008

"Murder Unscripted" : A Law & Order Spoof

Below is a video short from YouTube, called “Murder Unscripted”, starring some Law & Order franchise and Homicide: Life on The Streets actors (Chris Noth, Kathryn Erbe, Eric Bogosian, Zeljko Ivanek). Someone put it together in support of the Writers Guild of America (WGA). Being the tough critic I am, I have to warn you that I think the video is only mildly funny. Frankly, with some of the recent less than stellar episodes for some of the L&O franchise shows, I think it already seems like amateurs are writing them. And by the way, I think Eric Bogosian’s acting in “Murder Unscripted” is just about on par with his performances on Criminal Intent, so I guess I didn’t see what was supposed to be funny about him in this clip. (Sarcasm intended.)

Editorial comment: I do understand what the writers are trying to accomplish by their strike. I just hope they don’t cut off their noses to spite their faces by holding out too long or setting their goals too high. Some shows, like the soaps, could be killed, never to return, if the strike goes on too long. And that would put a lot of writers – and a lot of others who support their craft and these shows – out of work too.

Anyway, enjoy the video!


Murder Unscripted


Check out my blog home page for the latest Law & Order information,
HERE!

Also, see my companion Law & Order site,
These Are Their Stories.

Law & Order SVU: A Sloppy “Signature”

Law & Order SVU’s “Signature” had so many possibilities. The underlying story was interesting. But major flaws in its execution made this episode almost painful to watch.

The story centered on Benson’s (Mariska Hargitay) and FBI Agent Cooper’s (Erika Christensen) investigation of a murder at the hands of a known serial killer, and then for the murder of the serial killer himself. It was somewhat disturbing – a word I rarely use to describe an SVU episode – to see the serial killer’s place of operation, and to see the TV playing what appeared to be a recording of a victim’s graphic torture and screams. It really displayed that SVU investigates heinous crimes, a word used in their introduction but a trait that seems absent from SVU for a while.

The flaws in the show are many. First and foremost was the guest star, Erika Christensen. With the exception of the final scene in which she appeared, she was absolutely horrible. In some of her initial scenes, her voice seemed as if it had to be dubbed over. Her delivery was flat and lifeless. As far as the character she played, most questionable was her grabbing a scalpel-like object to cut open the tape over a victim’s mouth. What was she thinking by holding an object over the victim that was likely used to torture the victim? If her wooden acting was supposed to convey a detached FBI agent, it really didn’t work. I found her character to be highly annoying.

We also could have done without super detective (sarcasm intended) Chester Lake (Adam Beach). His method of putting himself in Agent Cooper’s mind while searching her apartment was laughable. SVU seems intent on making Chester out to be some kind of magical Sherlock Holmes style detective or profiler who can get in a suspect’s head or who always has the most obscure piece of knowledge to help solve a case. It’s not working. I’m getting tired of Chester and he needs to go.

Another annoyance is that when one of the show’s major players is missing, the story never seems to explain it. Did I miss an explanation for Stabler’s (Chris Meloni) absence? And where is Munch and Fin? SVU has repeatedly messed with the chemistry of this show and it is really dragging it down.

Getting back to the ever-wise Chester, how come it apparently never seemed to cross his mind – or Benson’s for that matter – that Agent Cooper had another gun in her possession? It seemed to obvious to me that once they walked into Cooper’s apartment and saw her sitting at a table with her gun and badge on it, that a suicide was coming. Just because they pulled the gun off the table and she said that her mentor’s gun was taken apart and disposed of doesn’t mean that she was truthful about that gun. Poor work on the part of the writers here; they seemed to make the detectives put down their guard once the gun was off the table. Benson’s reaction was gripping, though, although it did seem to telegraph “ for Emmy consideration.”

Benson’s defense of this FBI agent was also misplaced, considering that she just met this woman and really didn’t know much about her. Yes, I know she told Captain Cragen (Dann Florek) something like “You don’t know her” but Cragen reminded Olivia that she didn’t really know her either. Olivia’s “spider senses” seem way off this season.

And count me still confused as to why an EADA pulled the case against the agent. I thought they had enough evidence to proceed with the case.

My suggestion to the writers and producers at Law & Order SVU is to go back and look at the episodes from the first two seasons. There was grittiness to the stories, and a chemistry with the cast, that is absent lately. “Special Victims” seems less than special.

Check out my blog home page for the latest Law & Order information,
HERE!

Also, see my companion Law & Order site,
These Are Their Stories.

Monday, January 7, 2008

“Signature”: New SVU Episode, Air Date January 8, 2008

Here’s a summary of the upcoming NEW Law & Order SVU episode, set to air on Tuesday. January 8, at 10:00 PM ET.


A woman's body is found murdered in a Central Park, alongside a man with a bullet in his head. Benson (Mariska Hargitay) and Special Agent Cooper (guest star Erika Christensen) join forces and suspect "The Woodsman", a serial killer Cooper has tried to catch for years. Lake (Adam Beach) and Benson begin to question Cooper's true motives when the male victim is later identified as "The Woodsman"


Check out my blog home page for the latest Law & Order information,
HERE!

Also, see my companion Law & Order site,
These Are Their Stories.

Saturday, January 5, 2008

Law & Order Season Premier Is Tops in Ratings

It must be nice to be back home. Law & Order, returning to its original time slot - plus an extra hour earlier - welcomes itself back with some great ratings. (See information from Zap2it, below.) It sounds, though, that they didn't grab the key demographic that Dick Wolf seemingly geared the new cast members to attract. I guess NBC and the advertisers will have to be happy with us "over 49 old folks" who probably have a lot more disposable income that they think. Also, CSI-NY, the usual rating grabber, is in reruns, so hopefully L&O will continue to strengthen to hold on to, or increase, those numbers once CSI-NY runs new episodes.

The New York Post also reported on January 4: " "L&O" snared 13.4 million viewers (9-11 p.m.) with new cast members Linus Roache and Jeremy Sisto on board. Those were NBC's best numbers, in that time slot, since April 2005 (excluding Olympics coverage)." Hmmmm...a lot of Law & Order fans chided NBC for moving the show from Wednesday night, and as it looks from the ratings, the fans seem smarter than the people at NBC (but you already knew that!).



Zap2it reports the following:

" 'Law' on NBC's Side Wednesday
Series return tops Fiesta Bowl in ratings

January 3, 2008

Fast National ratings for Wednesday, Jan. 2, 2008


The return of "Law & Order" to NBC Wednesday brought the network a share of the ratings crown.

NBC won the night overall with an 8.5 rating/13 share. FOX came in second with a 7.3/11, with those numbers subject to change as the network aired live college football. ABC, 5.8/9, finished third, topping CBS' 4.5/7. The CW drew a 1.4/2.

FOX snagged the top spot among adults 18-49 with a 4.1 rating. ABC and NBC tied for second in the key demographic at 3.7. CBS averaged 1.9 and The CW 0.9.

"Deal or No Deal" 7.7/12, put NBC on top at 8 p.m. FOX's coverage of the Fiesta Bowl earned a 7.0/11. ABC's "Wife Swap" premiered to a 5.6/9, beating the 4.3/7 for the return of "Power of 10" on CBS. The CW trailed with "Crowned.

"The "Law & Order" premiere scored a 9.1/14 for NBC at 9 p.m. FOX's college football improved to 8.0/12. "Supernanny" returned to ABC with a 5.7/9, keeping the Alphabet ahead of a "Criminal Minds" rerun on CBS. "Gossip Girl," 1.6/2, closed the night for The CW.

At 10 p.m., a second installment of "Law & Order" drew an 8.7/14 for NBC. The Fiesta Bowl dipped to 7.0/11 on FOX. Another hour of "Supernanny" ticked up a little on ABC, while CBS got a 4.3/7 from a rerun of "CSI: NY."

Ratings information is taken from fast national data, which includes live and same-day DVR viewing. All numbers are preliminary and subject to change, especially in the case of live telecasts. "

Check out my blog home page for the latest Law & Order information,
HERE!

Also, see my companion Law & Order site,
These Are Their Stories.

Thursday, January 3, 2008

Law & Order - A Shaky Start?

The much awaited Law & Order season premier last night left me with mixed feelings. It was great to have the show back, but I’m not quite sure that I liked some of the changes. Generally, I thought both episodes were average.

The good: Sam Waterston is still in it. Alana De La Garza finally looks human. Favorites S. Epatha Merkerson and Jesse Martin are still holding the fort. Linus Roache looks like a good fit. The opening credits finally have new pictures, and Jack McCoy looks appropriately like the “BMOC” (Big Man On Campus for those of you who can’t keep up on abbreviations). I have to admit, though, that I miss “The Walk” down the hallway with Jack, and the new shot, take outside at the courthouse, makes the group look disconnected emotionally, like they are not really a team.

The bad: The stories. The shaky cam. The lifeless, trite dialog. Jeremy Sisto. The spark, and the edginess, is gone. Suddenly the entire DA’s office seems to have a lot more people milling around and seems a lot messier.

In my opinion, the first episode “Called Home” was an uninteresting story that really didn’t seem to draw me in. How many times does the franchise have to do a story on assisted suicides and the fallout from them? The series used to take great pains to keep personal information out of the show, and only feed it to people in tiny tidbits buried somewhere in the dialog or scene, as some sort of ghostly apparition. With this episode, we get a mumbling Cyrus Lupo – and his brother's family – as the central story line. I cringed every time his sister in law and kids appeared on the screen. I hoped this would not be a pattern (more on this later).

Jack McCoy had the best lines in the show. For example, he says to Cutter when Cutter seems in over his head; “ Duffy. Look that up in your gadget.” And of course, there's the slam against Arthur Branch, and maybe all the other previous District Attorneys, “ It’s a working office now, not a showroom.” Of course, Jack still seems to have the need to hang his clothes in his office, despite the fact that as DA, he probably has a very nice closet somewhere.

And this may seem like an insignificant issue to most people, but I really didn’t care for the woman judge. I wish we would have gotten one of the usual standbys as we did in the second episode. Maybe the old standbys are abandoning a sinking ship? And did I miss somewhere a previous explanation of what happened to Detective Nina Cassady (Milena Govich)? Not that I miss her - I don’t - it just would be nice if the show explained it.

Can anyone verify a timeline issue? The date indicated August 15 when the TV guy’s defense attorney was on the outside stairs to the courthouse, when he said that Jack was in DA’s office for less than two weeks. Does anyone recall the date shown when Jack made his first appearance as DA on Law & Order SVU a few weeks back? (By the way, Jack’s office looked much cleaner then.) I’m wondering if they synchronized the timelines. We know that Dick Wolf et.al. are not that good in continuity.


The second episode, “Darkness” begins with a horrifying sight for me. Lupo’s brother’s family has returned. Oh please, my brain screamed silently, don’t make this a habit. The first segment seemed more like a Criminal Intent episode, where we are introduced to the victims. Frankly, I prefer the standard Law & Order intro where the crime has already taken place. In my opinion, it cuts to the chase a little faster, and makes the unfolding of the story and building the case more compelling.

There were also a few things that seemed off. For example, where they were chasing the guy who was on the bike, when Ed and Cyrus rounded the corner, the shop owner was already shouting to them that the man had an accident. There also seemed to be way too much blood on the ground for something that just happened and instant earlier. Prior to that scene, Ed also suddenly forgets Lennie’s patented way of getting around the need for a search warrant, where Lennie would say “I think I hear a scream”, or “I think I smell gas” etc. to rationalize his entry. Instead, Ed calls Cutter, who is in a courtroom that seems to be in complete disarray due to a simple power outage. I would have been much easier if Ed would have just learned from Lennie and taken the risk. The whole issue with the absent warrant may have been moot. On a separate issue: did we really need a scene where a woman on the street comes on to Lupo during the outage? A completely worthless scene, seemingly the purpose was that we were supposed to find Lupo attractive? (I don't.)

It also appears that Jack McCoy, the EADA who never seemed to care about politics or his job, is suddenly rife with commentary about protecting himself. We heard it in the first episode when Jack rails on Cutter for making what he thought was a questionable arrest, and in “Darkness”, Jack says “What do you do for fun Mike? Juggle chains saws with my neck on the line?” Of course, there’s also the inference that Jack is, well, old. Rubirosa mentions in an earlier scene that Jack still has an antique typewriter in his office that’s she’d pry out of his hands. Couple that with the ubiquitous Blackberry and it’s their way of saying out with the old, in with the new, and even Jack has sold out to a point.

The one line that was right on the mark was during a scene in McCoy’s office, while they were discussing the power company collusion. I had just been thinking that the writers really stretched this story to an unbelievable place with the whole idea that the kidnapping was timed to coincide with the power outage. Right at that point, McCoy says “The vice president of a power company involved in a kidnapping? C’mon!” Thanks Jack, for being as incredulous as I was and for stating the obvious. Of course, that acknowledgement, probably put there by the writers to maybe get them off the hook for such a ridiculous stretch, didn’t make it any better.


While I’m glad the show is back, I think that the show has lost its way. It seems to be sanitized of any drama, and of credible stories. Jeremy Sisto mumbles worse than Richard Brooks when he played Paul Robinette in the early years of the series, and Sisto seems to be the weak link here. He’s overly brooding and a little lifeless to me. But there is hope in the DA’s office. Linus Roache show promise, despite the trite, and fake, New York accent. Alana De La Garza finally looks like the beautiful woman that she is, and even her acting seems to have increased life. And of course, Sam Waterston is still there, acting as the glue that keeps it all together.

I hope the following weeks are better...or that my expectations come back down to earth.

Check out my blog home page for the latest Law & Order information,
HERE!

Also, see my companion Law & Order site,
These Are Their Stories.